The Reality of Jesus' Resurrection

The Women who first visited Jesus' tomb and the two unnamed followers of Christ from Emmaus were not the only ones to become convinced of the bodily resurrection of Jesus (Luke 24:1-49). How did first-century Christians come to believe in the reality of the resurrection? How did this belief change their lives? Answers to these questions are as important to us as they were to the

The reported facts are quite straightforward. On the third day after Jesus died, His tomb was found to be empty. On that same day some of His followers began to report that Jesus was alive and had appeared to them. Let's ponder these two primary facts, and then add additional considerations that help undergird belief in the reality of Jesus' resurrection.

The Empty Tomb

As only one piece of the evidence, an empty tomb would equate roughly to a modern-day news item that declared a body was missing from the local morgue. Multiple explanations other than a resurrection could account for an empty tomb (or an empty morgue). Tomb robbers could have stolen Jesus' body. The local authorities immediately put forth that possibility. They bribed false witnesses to put out the word that Jesus' friends had taken His body from the tomb (Matt. 28:11-15).

What about a second possibility? Jesus' enemies could have removed His body, maybe as added insult or cruelty. Actually, Mary Magdalene, the first eyewitness of the empty tomb, immediately theorized that Jesus' body had been removed by people whom she designated simply as "they" (John 20:11-15). Likely Mary was thinking of the authorities who had condemned Jesus and carried out His crucifixion or maybe of Joseph and Nicodemus, whom the women had watched attend to the hasty burial (Luke 23:50-56; John 19:38-42).

In later times, skeptics have put forward other explanations for the empty tomb. One suggestion has been that the early eyewitnesses simply visited the wrong tomb. Another idea has been that Jesus did not actually die, but dropped into a deep coma from which He revived during the hours in the cool tomb.

Obviously, the biblical accounts do not make room for such whimsical explanations. The empty tomb that the women visited was one at which the angelic visitor waited and in which Peter and John saw vacated burial cloths. The Roman soldiers who carried out the crucifixion were not novices at putting people to death-they recognized death when they saw it. Furthermore, given the flogging before the cross and the physical toll taken by the hours on the cross, one awakening from a coma would hardly have been able to walk about immediately and certainly would not be able to dislodge a great stone from the tomb's entrance.

As for the more plausible possibilities of accounting for the empty tomb, further reflection discounts such explanations. Given that a guard was posted at the site, grave robbers would have been apprehended. If Jesus' enemies, whether Roman authorities or Jewish leaders, had taken His body, their later concern about the widely spreading message of a resurrection could have been squelched quickly and decisively by producing the body.

If the followers of Jesus had taken His body, they hardly would have suffered and died in carrying out the mission of proclaiming a resurrection gospel, while knowing all along that no resurrection had happened. As has often been said, martyrs and liars are hardly cut from the same cloth. Of course, people have died for their devotion to a lie, but not while believing the object of that devotion to be untrue. Intentional deceivers do not normally give their lives to known deceit.

Resurrection Appearances

When all that can be said about an empty tomb has been said, the full basis on which the early Christians believed in the resurrection of Jesus Christ from the dead has not been told. The reports of the empty tomb did not cause any of Jesus' followers to think immediately or automatically "resurrection!" but rather "removal." But then they began to see Jesus alive from the dead during the ensuing days and weeks. Resurrection appearances served to give credence to the true explanation for an empty tomb-a bodily resurrection had indeed occurred.

To be sure, an isolated report of an individual or two claiming to have seen Jesus alive might be dismissed as hallucination brought on by deep emotional stress over His death and an intense longing to see Him one more time. But Jesus' resurrection appearances were not singular moments experienced by only one or two distraught persons. Jesus kept appearing to many different persons. Multiple firsthand reports constitute much stronger testimony than would innumerable secondhand testimonies that simply repeated what one or two eyewitnesses claimed they had seen.

Jesus' followers did not at the first come to believe in His resurrection on the basis on others' words. Everyone wanted to see for himself or herself. Each tended to reserve judgment until they personally saw the evidence. Hence, Peter and John ran to the tomb to see for themselves that it was empty. The other disciples did not take the women's word until they had seen Jesus (Mark 16:9-14). Thomas did not believe on the basis of the report of his fellow disciples. Once a cadre of eyewitnesses had been formed, however, Jesus ascended and left behind a believable base of hundreds of eyewitnesses whose testimony could ignite a chain reaction of commitments to the truth of the resurrection.

Not insignificant is the fact that those who reported seeing Jesus alive were convinced against their wills. Apparently, they did not expect to see Jesus alive after His crucifixion in spite of His repeated announcements to them that He would not only suffer and die, but also be raised (8:31; 9:30-31; 10:32-34). The women had to be convinced it was Jesus whom they saw, not the gardener of the tomb site. As already mentioned, the disciples took the first news that some had seen Jesus as hardly more than idle tales not to be believed (Luke 24:10-11). In particular, Thomas demanded firsthand, physical proof to be convinced (John 20:24-29).

The Christian Movement

Establishment of a Christian community and its subsequent spread make sense only on the basis of Jesus' resurrection. Other self-proclaimed messiahs had their fledgling movements dry up with their deaths. Why did the Christian movement flourished following Jesus' death?

N. T. Wright, a scholar who has written extensively in the past decade about the resurrection, contended

In his work The Resurrection of the Son of God, Wright concluded that the Christian movement is hardly explainable apart from an actual resurrection.

A trio of additional corroborative facts plays into first-century Christians' unshakable conviction about the reality of Jesus' resurrection. First, His uncommon life was commensurate with an uncommon resurrection from the dead. Second, the earliest Christians developed a confession about Jesus' being Lord. Third, that confession brought about a change in those who embraced it.

The Uncommon Life

In a way that would not be true with any other person, Jesus' resurrection matched the uncommon life He lived. Suppose for a moment that someone reported that one of the thieves crucified alongside Jesus had been seen alive several days after his death. Would being raised from death seem to be a fitting sequel to the kind of life he had lived prior to his death? Certainly not in the way that is true with Jesus. In His life, Jesus demonstrated God's power over sickness, afflictions, and even death. Jesus' life, therefore, served to make more credible to those who knew Him the belief that He was raised from the dead.

The Early Confession

Early followers of Jesus shortly after His resurrection began to confess "Jesus is Lord!" This was a confession that reflected a personal salvation experience. Because of that confession, however, Jesus' followers suffered loss, ridicule, and even their lives (Rom. 10:9-10). The resurrection serves as the only logical explanation for that early conviction that Jesus is Lord. Jesus in a tomb would never have elicited such a confession. Alabama.

Changed Lives

Added to the convincing evidences of an empty tomb, resurrection appearances, and the dramatic advance of the Christian movement was the experiential basis for the early followers believing in Jesus' resurrection. They found their lives being dramatically and permanently changed through their faith in and ongoing relationship with the living Christ. The Holy Spirit, whom Jesus promised would come to them in His stead, made the presence of Christ continuingly and convincingly real to them.

How else to account for Peter's bold transformation from cringing weakling at Jesus' questioning before the high priest into the bold preacher at Pentecost-other than an encounter with the resurrected Christ (1 Cor. 15:5)? This transformation was true not only for Simon Peter; it was also true for Jesus' brother, James. In the main, recent scholarly opinion holds that "James was an unbeliever until he experienced an appearance of the risen Jesus (1 Cor. 15:7)." [John Dominic Crossan and Nicholas Thomas Wright, The Resurrection of Jesus, Robert B. Stewart, ed. (Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 2006), 79.]

The biblical records that Jesus' followers became convinced of His resurrection by many proofs (Acts 1:3). Following the resurrection Jesus' followers saw Him, walked with Him, sat with Him, heard Him, touched Him, and on at least four occasions watched Him eat (Luke 24:30,41-43; John 21:13). These encounters forever changed them.

The women saw the resurrected Christ. Peter, the other disciples, and countless others saw him too. Twenty centuries later, though, the crowning proof for us-of Jesus being alive from the dead-is our own experience of what faith in Him produces in our lives. Our Lord is alive and we have tasted and seen that He is good!

This article is courtesy of Biblical Illustrator Magazine.