 |


"Aging must be viewed as a lifelong and society-wide process, not just a phenomenon affecting older adults."
|
 |
 |
 |
Twenty-first Century Demographics of Adults
Increasingly throughout the world people face the prospect of living far more
than "three score and ten." And still there is more news about the changing
family. Married couples are a bare majority of U.S. households. Only about one-third
of households have any children under 18 present. People who live alone comprise
one-fourth of U.S. households.
Do you want to live to be a hundred years old? Already the fastest growing
age group is 90 plus, and as might be inferred from this discussion, the median
age of the population is growing older. In 1990, it was 33 years; in 1995, it
moved up to 34.7; and in 2000, it is 36.4. The non-Hispanic white population
in the U.S. will decline to 67.6 percent, and minority populations will increase
to 13.2 percent African-American; 13.2 percent Hispanic; 5.9 Asian; and 0.9
percent Native American, Eskimo, and Aleutian. By the middle of this century,
it is projected that the United States population will be one-half non-Hispanic
white and moving toward a majority that is currently a minority.
Christian leaders of adults must face the demographic realities at the beginning
of this new millennium. Consider these facts:
- In 2010, just a few years away, there will be 2.9 workers for every person
receiving Social Security. In 1950, there were 16.6 workers for every person
receiving Social Security.
- In 2010, a "1997 dollar" will be worth about 63 cents.
- In 2000, your chance of contracting malignant melanoma is 1 in 75. In 1935,
the risk was 1 in 1,500.
- Shortly after 2020, there will be more Americans over age 65 than under
age 13.
- Not surprisingly, there will be a drop in the number of persons in the
25–34 category, while adults 45–54 will realize a dramatic growth. The 1990
Census reveals that 33 states had fewer youth in 1990 than they did in 1980.
- The youngest baby boomers—those born between 1956 and 1964 are moving out
of their childbearing years.
- Furthermore, 70 million baby boomers are lifetime learners.
- And youth account for only 16 percent of the population.
Already apparent is an enormous growth in the number of older persons in our
nation. Revolutionary changes in society call for revolutionary thinking and
innovative solutions. Aging must be viewed as a lifelong and society-wide process,
not just a phenomenon affecting older adults. As an example, older persons will
become more involved in civic life than their parents. People will live longer
and have several careers. Already government agencies classify elderly status
as age 62 or older, rather than 65. Coincidentally, that is the average retirement
age.
The Census Bureau reports that the number of older Americans is growing faster
than other segments of the population. The preeminent fact about the elderly
population is its size and comparatively rapid growth: There were 34.1 million
people age 65 years or older in the United States in 1997. One in 8 Americans
is a senior citizen today, compared to only 1 in 25 at the dawn of the last
century.
The number of older Americans has increased by more than 9 percent since 1990,
compared with a rise of 7 percent among persons under age 65. And this disparity
is occurring at a low ebb in elderly population growth. Men and women reaching
age 65 today were born during the Great Depression, when birthrates were particularly
low. This relative pause in elderly population increases will end abruptly around
2010, when those born during the post-World War II baby boom begin to retire.
Today's elderly population is expected to double by 2030, expanding at a rate
of almost 3 percent each year to almost 70 million people. The Census Bureau
estimates that 20 percent of Americans will be older than retirement age in
2030, compared with less than 13 percent today. These demographic trends merit
further examination.
- The largest and fastest growing segments of the older population include
many people who have historically been vulnerable economically: women, minorities,
and the "oldest old." This explosive growth sends a straightforward message
to our churches and church leaders: more and more of our church buildings,
church budgets, staff member's time and creativity should be devoted to seniors
and their needs and potential. However this begs the further question: which
subgroups of seniors need this special attention?
- The ranks of the oldest Americans—those 85 years old and over—are swelling
much more rapidly than those of the "young" elderly are. These oldest Americans
made up less than 9 percent of the elderly population in 1980; they have grown
to more than 11 percent of the elderly today and may make up 23 percent by
2050. As a consequence church leaders, members of building committees, and
others need to know about special building considerations for the elderly.
For instance, older persons with sight problems need increased lighting.
- Elderly women greatly outnumber men, particularly as they age. Women can
expect to live 19 years after reaching age 65, compared to 15.8 years for
men. In 1997, there were 143 elderly women for every 100 elderly men. For
the oldest old (85 plus) the ratio grows to 248 women for every 100 men.
- Finally, more of America's seniors are minorities. Racial and ethnic minorities
are younger on average than whites and have significantly lower life expectancies;
nevertheless, their representation in the elderly population is increasing.
In 1997, 15 percent of the U.S. elderly population were minorities; 8 percent
were African-American. By 2025, 24 percent will be minorities.
Is there a connection between these demographics and your church? Yes. These
trends reflect the statistical study of the population with regard to their
size and density. In other words, the trends in the United States likely also
reflect similar trends in your community, your church field, and the adults
in your church who are 46–53, both members and prospects. Demographic studies
provide valuable information.
Christian leaders should know about adults in general, about their age, level
of education, how many people are in a household and who they are, their income
group, their employment status, and many other distinctives. If, for instance,
you are teaching a Sunday School class of persons 46–53, you will need to know
pertinent information about them. It is not enough for teachers to know their
subject matter well; they must also know about the people in the class. Part
of the blame for ineffective lessons or classroom studies can be laid on teachers
who have studied their lesson well but cannot relate lesson content to the real
needs of participants. They have understudied members and perhaps have overstudied
their lesson.
Of course, teachers assume they know their participants based on their experiences
together at church. Unfortunately, adults often do not project their needs honestly
in church. In fact, an adult can easily appear to be one kind of person at church
but a different kind of person the rest of the time. We can gain some information
from church experiences, but that is no match for knowing each person one-on-one
in personal visits and other engagements.
One value of demographic studies about the church community is that church
leaders can match the ministries of the church more closely to those whom they
are called to serve. One church had a long history of Anglo ministers. The church
field began to change to an older, Hispanic neighborhood in the 70s, yet the
church still retained the same staff composition. A new pastor came onto the
field in 1998, looked at the field, and found them not "white" unto harvest
but brown and black. He looked at adults in general—their ages, levels of education,
the number of people in a typical household and who they were, their income
groups, their employment status, and many other distinctives. With this information
and the guidance of a church growth task force, the church decided to call a
Hispanic minister of music and senior adults. This combination took some adjustment
for the congregation, but in the past year they have seen a number of Hispanics
join the previously all-Anglo church. One is now a deacon.
In another case, Calvary Baptist Church recognized that their building allocations
did not match the new demographics of the 21st century. In the 60s, they had
a large youth group and built their present building accordingly. Now they have
fewer youth and children, but the adult population the church is called to reach
can barely fit into the two department rooms, which were sufficient 30 years
ago. What will they do? In the next few years they plan to convert youth and
children's space into adult rooms to provide for the needed and anticipated
growth in adults, particularly senior adults. On the drawing board are six adult
departments instead of the current two.
For further reading on adult development, consult Helen Bee and Barbara Bjorklaund,
The Journey of Adulthood, Fourth Edition (Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice
Hall, 2000).
AdultApplication: What
do these statistics say to churches planning to build in the next 20 years? What
modifications would your building require to meet the needs of a growing adult
population? How would your church ministries need to change? Will staff assignments
need to be adjusted? Are your church leaders preparing for this new demographic
reality?
|
 |